AI is creating massive economic and geopolitical divides, with certain nations and communities benefiting while others fall further behind.
AI’s Unequal Economic Impact
Right now, AI is disproportionately benefiting a small handful of countries and corporations, while others are stuck playing catch-up. The United States and China, the two undisputed heavyweights of AI development, are racing to dominate the space, pouring hundreds of billions into research, infrastructure, and talent acquisition. Meanwhile, smaller nations, developing economies, and organizations without trillion-dollar war chests simply don’t have the resources to compete.
AI is widening the global economic divide, creating haves and have-nots in a way that eerily resembles the industrial revolutions of the past; except this time, instead of coal, steel, and oil, the commodities in question are compute power, proprietary datasets, and advanced machine learning models.
The world has seen this before. A handful of countries develop the technology, dominate the market, and extract value from the rest of the world, all while promising that their innovations will eventually “lift everyone up.”
Sound familiar?
That’s because it’s the same economic playbook that defined the 19th and 20th centuries. Except now, instead of railroads and oil rigs, it’s GPUs and AI algorithms.
If we don’t change course, AI won’t democratize technology. It will consolidate power in the hands of those who already have it, and everyone else will be left in the digital dust.
The AI Divide Between Rich and Poor Nations
AI is expensive. Not just regular expensive, but “if-you-have-to-ask-you-can’t-afford-it” expensive. Training a state-of-the-art AI model requires:
Enormous computational power (Think warehouses full of NVIDIA GPUs burning through electricity like a Vegas casino.)
Vast proprietary datasets (Accumulated through years of user data, government partnerships, and industry monopolization.)
Elite AI talent (Most of whom are either in Silicon Valley or China’s growing AI hubs.)
If you don’t have these three things? Good luck to ya.
Right now, the U.S. and China control over 80% of global AI research and development funding (Brookings, 2023). Europe is trying to keep pace, but regulatory red tape and lack of AI infrastructure are slowing its progress. Meanwhile, Africa, Latin America, and smaller European nations are stuck on the sidelines watching as the AI economy takes off without them.
And here’s where things get even more frustrating ==> many of these countries are essential to AI’s supply chain, but they aren’t sharing in the rewards.
The Global South is doing the AI industry’s grunt work; labeling data, cleaning datasets, and moderating content. The problem? The wages are low, and the benefits are non-existent. AI talent in these countries is often poached by Big Tech, meaning trained locally but lured to Silicon Valley or Beijing with salaries that local economies simply can’t match.
AI policies and regulations are being written by Western governments and corporations, often with zero input from the nations most affected by these systems.
Example: Data-Labeling Workers in Kenya and India. OpenAI, Google, and other AI giants rely heavily on data-labeling workforces in places like Kenya and India, where workers manually tag images, classify text, and filter AI-generated outputs. The pay? Sometimes as low as $1-$2 per hour (Time, 2023). These workers are essential to training AI models, but they don’t share in the profits, patents, or decision-making power.
This isn’t global AI development. It’s outsourced digital labor. Cheap, replaceable, and deliberately hidden behind the glossy marketing campaigns of AI’s biggest players.
The New Digital Colonialism: Extracting Value Without Sharing It
If the 19th and 20th centuries were shaped by resource extraction (minerals, oil, labor), the 21st century is shaping up to be an era of data and compute extraction. AI is reinforcing a new kind of economic dependency, where developing nations consume AI products and services but don’t own or profit from the core technologies.
Big Tech companies are treating AI like a one-way street. How you ask? They extract vast amounts of data from developing nations (often without meaningful consent or compensation). They train AI models using open datasets that were built with contributions from global researchers, universities, and governments. They then monetize the AI, patent its capabilities, and lock it behind corporate walls.
Example: Meta’s AI Expansion in Africa. Meta has heavily invested in AI research in Africa, but let’s be real, it’s not charity. The company has built data-labeling hubs and AI research partnerships, but its real interest is in harvesting linguistic and cultural data to improve its models. The economic benefits for local communities remain minimal. Meanwhile, Meta retains full control over how these AI models are commercialized (Rest of World, 2023).
Policy and Economic Strategies for AI Inclusion
So, what do we do? The AI economic divide isn’t inevitable, it’s a policy choice. Maybe these strategies could level the playing field:
1. Open-Source AI & Decentralized Compute
Making AI more open and accessible can weaken corporate monopolies.
Open-source AI models (like Meta’s LLaMA and Hugging Face’s community models) could allow smaller countries and organizations to build AI without relying on tech giants.
Challenge ==> Even open-source AI requires expensive compute resources; so this alone won’t solve the problem.
2. State-Backed AI Infrastructure
Some nations are fighting back by investing in sovereign AI development.
India and Brazil are pushing for state-backed AI computing resources to avoid dependence on Western or Chinese cloud services (Quartz, 2024).
Challenge ==> Competing with U.S. and Chinese AI dominance is expensive and politically complex.
3. AI Trade Policies & Fair Economic Agreements
Governments should push for fairer AI trade policies, ensuring that data contributors, labeling workers, and researchers get a stake in AI’s profits.
AI-driven companies should be required to reinvest in the economies that provide their labor and data, not just extract and leave.
Avoiding an AI-Powered Economic Divide
If AI is allowed to follow the traditional patterns of technological monopolization, we’re headed for a future where a handful of corporations and countries own the AI economy, while the rest of the world remains dependent on their infrastructure.
But it doesn’t have to go that way. With stronger AI governance, fairer trade policies, and more equitable resource distribution, AI could actually become a tool for economic empowerment rather than just another vehicle for consolidation.
###
Stay Connected & Keep Exploring
If you found this article insightful, there’s more to explore:
For bite-sized emerging tech insights, follow my LinkedIn newsletter: Emerging Technology
Check out the Mental Models & Mastery newsletter on LinkedIn.
Connect with me on LinkedIn for discussions & real-time updates.
Comments